Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369
I don’t watch much college ball and I certainly don’t break down game tape so admittedly my knowledge of the players in the draft is primarily limited to other people’s scouting reports. I see Edmunds as the possible 4th player only because of the sky high potential most reports rave about with him and my belief Ballard is taking a longer term view for building the roster. I have no idea if that potential is real or not. Personally from my limited knowledge I’d prefer Chubb as well.
|
If he's taking the long approach it might be Edmunds. I didn't know he was 19, his poor coverage makes a lot more sense in the context of him having no clue what the hell he was doing, as does so many people ranking him so highly. That said, I think Fitzpatrick is that 4th guy. He's a quick to react, an enforcer and a ballhawk in the secondary, has the cover skills of a corner and the run support of a linebacker. Putting he and Hooker in the same backfield would make throwing the ball very hard on opposing QBs.