I had a few problems with his premise.
1. Ballard seems like a guy to do due diligence, so picking a guy before interviews is unlikely.
2. Wilson and Hooker fell to us as BPA, so their selection means nothing.
3. He assumes it will be a defensive guy, but an offensive guy could bring a guy in to run whatever scheme the two of them feel is best.
4. The 4-3 guys also have played 3-4, and being versatile is perfect for a hybrid defense like we have been running, and would give flexibility to the new coaching staff.
5. WTF does a practice squad QB have to do with a 4-3?
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
|