View Single Post
  #11  
Old 10-17-2017, 12:04 AM
nate505 nate505 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 5,259
Thanks: 2,593
Thanked 3,181 Times in 1,835 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
The odds weren't that bad. There just wasn't a great camera angle on the sideline. Even a 5% chance at 1st and 10 inside the 20 was worth that risk when you had three TOs behind it. You give up one first and the game is over anyway.
I disagree about the odds not being that bad as the best angle showed he missed it by a ton, but again, at this point it's a pointless argument. I think we all agree, sans Dam, that Pagano is awful and needs to go.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nate505 For This Useful Post:
VeveJones007 (10-17-2017)