Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369
Supposedly 80 and above is considered good. An 18 would take Stroud off my board in first two rounds. Hooker’s score is pretty disappointing as well. Article I read had a team exec quoted as saying a high score doesn’t guarantee success, but they’ve never seen someone with a low one succeed. It’s lying season, but considering what it’s intended to measure I can believe that statement. Levis or Richardson for me.
|
That would be my expectation, similar to throwing against air. Looking good doesn't mean you'll look good in a game... but looking bad on air probably means you'll look bad in a game.
This entire offseason is new for me regarding QB's. Between having Manning/Luck for 21 seasons and then choosing vets the past several years... I've never felt the urge to study draft QB's like this.
So I don't know much about the S2 other than it tests processing and that it replaced the Wonderlic which tested recall. I'm curious to dig around and see how these scores have translated in the past.
But first reaction is... 18? Out of 100? Some of these guys got mid-90's and you got an 18? What is that about? OSU system?