Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369
So is the argument that the Colts should be ok being less efficient on offense for the sake of what the run may be able to do later in the game? In the second qtr Taylor ran 3 times and the team scored 21 points. The drives were 75, 90, and 75 yds. To me that’s pretty damn good offense, but it doesn’t appear you agree. If they rushed him 8 times and scored 10 points are you suggesting that would be better football?
|
I wouldn't argue on any particular play or drive. I agree that those were very good outcomes and could not really be improved. What I am talking about is the general direction this offense is taking. Your assumption is that if Taylor had run 8 times we would not have been as effective. Maybe, maybe not. We scored but we also got a L. We don't have the wide receivers to succeed with this long term in my opinion. Our offensive line is also a better run blocking line right now. As far as good football, they lost.