View Single Post
  #147  
Old 03-13-2019, 03:33 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,272
Thanks: 350
Thanked 962 Times in 528 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
The signing of Desir undercuts the argument that Funchess is only a placeholder. Ballard now has a track record of bringing in people for one year show me contracts and if they produce to pay them I really like our odds, in this environment with these coaches and this qb, of hitting a home run with this guy. Of course it isn't ordained but damn all the pieces are there
Pretty sure Desir has been on the roster the past two years, but yes he was on a one year contract. I wonder if he demanded the one year contract last year like the reports about Funchess or if that’s all he was offered? Either way, I agree that everything should be in place for Funchess to produce. If he can’t do it in this offense he’s not going to do it. But I highly doubt that he and the Colts will hit the sweet spot where they agree on a long term contract next year. But we’ll see. I hope it happens and I’ll happily eat crow if it does.
Reply With Quote