ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Ballard ten years ago (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=113587)

Discflinger 12-08-2020 07:49 AM

Ballard ten years ago
 
Would we have traded the pick with BDB? I say yes. Kept P and won two SBs. Jim fucked up, but we are on the right track.

omahacolt 12-08-2020 09:37 AM

I think he would have taken Luck. It was the smart move

TheMugwump 12-08-2020 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discflinger (Post 178399)
Would we have traded the pick with BDB? I say yes. Kept P and won two SBs. Jim fucked up, but we are on the right track.

100%

I will never forgive Irsay for letting Peyton suit up in any uniform other than the Colts. If any player in the history of the league deserved loyalty and the benefit of the doubt, it was Manning.

We saw what the Redskins gave up for RGIII. What would they, or another team, have given up for Luck?

albany ed 12-08-2020 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by omahacolt (Post 178407)
I think he would have taken Luck. It was the smart move

I agree. And, if not for the 18 million dollar roster bonus due to (a yet to be certain of his health) Peyton Manning, I think they would have drafted Luck and kept Manning for at least one more year. The roster bonus forced their hand to make a decision in the dark. If they passed on Luck and Manning never recovered, and Luck went on to have a stellar career with another team, :eek:

HoosierinFL 12-08-2020 02:04 PM

I mean, its interesting to think about trading that pick for a huge number of picks, and maybe being able to get someone like Dontari Poe or Luke Kuechly and other high defensive picks in later years (assuming the trade would have come with first rounds in the 2013 draft too).

But like omaha says, taking Luck was the smart thing to do.
What was not the smart thing to do was blowing up the entire organization and the decade of winning culture that was ingrained in that locker room.
The second not smart thing was doing that while hiring Grigson who had no bonafides as a potential GM.
The third not smart thing was trying to dial back the clock 30 years and take an old fashioned run the ball and stop the run approach to rebuilding the team.

Dam8610 12-08-2020 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by omahacolt (Post 178407)
I think he would have taken Luck. It was the smart move

The smart move, in hindsight, would've been to trade the #1 overall pick, draft Fletcher Cox with the top 5 draft pick acquired, draft Russell Wilson at 65, and use all that additional draft capital to build a superteam that Manning and Wilson would've led to multiple SBs.

Chromeburn 12-08-2020 06:47 PM

Ballard would have absolutely done the same thing because it wouldn't have been up to Ballard. It was up to Irsay. so it can't be counted a Grigson pick. Besides, Grigson's best pick was TY Hilton.

Even if it was up to Ballard, he would have taken Luck bc it was the smart move.

njcoltfan 12-08-2020 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discflinger (Post 178399)
Would we have traded the pick with BDB? I say yes. Kept P and won two SBs. Jim fucked up, but we are on the right track.

I've been trying to figure out, who the hell is BDB ???

Butter 12-08-2020 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by njcoltfan (Post 178478)
I've been trying to figure out, who the hell is BDB ???

Seriously? Our GM.

apballin 12-08-2020 11:16 PM

It wasn’t a fuck up, and everyone involved agreed it would’ve been unfair to have Luck sit behind Manning he was ready to go from day 1


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.