Packers interview Caldwell, pagano for HC job
 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...-pagano-for-hc

This is hilarious to me considering how most colt fans feel about these guys.

Rooney rule and Looney rule satisfied. Looney rule states that a team should interview someone worse than their desired choice to make their final decision seem intelligent.

So do they want the Looney or the Rooney? Either ways I would feel bad for Packers fans lol

What the ?????? Pagano, why? The jags could hire him, that would make me happy

Objectively:

Cardboard Jim Caldwell
7 seasons experience as NFL Head Coach
62 - 50 overall (26 - 22 with Colts; 36 - 28 with Lions)
5 seasons with winning records (of 7)
3 seasons with 10+ wins (of 7)
2 seasons with losing record (of 7)

Up Chuck Pagano
6 seasons experience as NFL Head Coach
53 - 43 overall
3 seasons with winning records (of 6)
3 seasons with 10+ wins (of 6)
1 season with losing record (of 6)

Having suffered through both, WE see their many flaws and problems.

But to the rest of the nation, their resumes look solid. Many NFL teams would look at those results with envy.

Let them interview and win jobs; that makes it better for us.

Walk Worthy,

This is why I've always said experience on resumes can be overrated.

Ehhh, what do we care? It's not like coaching matters.

(It was coming, and someone had to say it.)

For the sake of my Packer friends up here(I live in Wisconsin) I hope
it's just a case of due diligence. They've suffered enough this year.

I bet Aaron Rodgers didn't sleep a wink last night.

Hiring either one of those guys would just mean that Rodgers is, basically, the head coach. Neither Pagano or Caldwell could stand up to him, so Aaron would just keep them in his pocket. The team would suck, but it would be nice for Bears and Vikings fans. Detroit is a perpetual mess, so they're irrelevant.