ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Trade offers for Jacoby (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39262)

1965southpaw 03-26-2018 11:01 PM

Trade offers for Jacoby
 
Interesting. I'm happy that Ballard turned these offers down. We need the depth at QB.

https://coltswire.usatoday.com/2018/...-trade-offers/

sherck 03-27-2018 06:45 AM

I agree. In the overall scheme of things, having him as QB2 is pretty darn nice.

However, I would have loved to know what folks were offering. If it were a 2nd round pick, I am not so sure that I would not have taken it and then used our 4th or 5th round pick on backup QB.

But, my guess is that we will not know.

Walk Worthy,

omahacolt 03-27-2018 06:47 AM

Better to keep him. With better coaching he should be a top backup

Racehorse 03-27-2018 06:59 AM

Trading him in front of the draft would also hurt our chances of success with trades on draft day. Let the desperate teams stay desperate until we draft or trade the pick.

DrSpaceman 03-27-2018 09:00 AM

Would not trade him

As a full year starter he is iffy, but as a back up I think he is solid and can fill in well.

FatDT 03-27-2018 09:23 AM

Can't trade him til Luck is fully back. And I'd rather just have a good backup QB. If Foles ever gets traded, I'd base Brisset's value on that.

Chromeburn 03-27-2018 09:31 AM

I think in a year or two his value will max. But I like Brisset more than a lot of guys in this draft. With a better line and system I think he could do well.

VeveJones007 03-27-2018 10:17 AM

If Luck is back healthy next year, you trade him next offseason before he starts to get more expensive.

Racehorse 03-27-2018 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 61222)
If Luck is back healthy next year, you trade him next offseason before he starts to get more expensive.

Which guy are you referring to as "him"? Surely not Luck

VeveJones007 03-27-2018 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Racehorse (Post 61256)
Which guy are you referring to as "him"? Surely not Luck

Luck’s contract is locked in. How would he be getting “more expensive?”


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.