ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Khalil Mack (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=47619)

VeveJones007 07-26-2018 11:54 AM

Khalil Mack
 
Khalil Mack is holding out and hasn't even spoken with Gruden since he was hired. If you're Ballard, do you at least pick up the phone and see if the Raiders would be open to moving him?

Luck4Reich 07-26-2018 12:02 PM

27 years and consistent production.
What does his contract look like and
has he been healthy to date?

HoosierinFL 07-26-2018 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoLuck4Chuck (Post 72555)
27 years and consistent production.
What does his contract look like and
has he been healthy to date?

Not sure about the contract but he's started 16 games for the last 4 years, I'm not aware of any health issues recently

Dam8610 07-26-2018 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 72551)
Khalil Mack is holding out and hasn't even spoken with Gruden since he was hired. If you're Ballard, do you at least pick up the phone and see if the Raiders would be open to moving him?

Offer your 1 and hope for the best. He's worth it.

Oldcolt 07-26-2018 02:48 PM

Would love to get him but Oakland isn’t letting him go

Luck4Reich 07-26-2018 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 72568)
Offer your 1 and hope for the best. He's worth it.

Doubt Ballard would do that.

Dam8610 07-26-2018 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoLuck4Chuck (Post 72584)
Doubt Ballard would do that.

That's okay. The 2019 DL class is deep.

JAFF 07-26-2018 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldcolt (Post 72583)
Would love to get him but Oakland isn’t letting him go


Why would any afc team release/trade their best passrusher while still young and effective?

FatDT 07-26-2018 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 72591)
Why would any afc team release/trade their best passrusher while still young and effective?

John Gruden is terrible at personnel management.

DragonTails 07-26-2018 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 72591)
Why would any afc team release/trade their best passrusher while still young and effective?

Ego.

Coltsalr 07-26-2018 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 72591)
Why would any afc team release/trade their best passrusher while still young and effective?

If the Raiders trade Khalil Mack then I’ll have to assume that Al Davis has been faking his own death for the last seven years.

Maniac 07-26-2018 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldcolt (Post 72583)
Would love to get him but Oakland isn’t letting him go

This. Not happening. It would be like us trading away Freeney in his prime. Make the effort to fix the issue, don't get rid of an extremely talented player at one of the most important positions.

Colt Classic 07-26-2018 07:09 PM

Maybe if they switch their base defense, they'll get rid of him. :cool:

sherck 07-27-2018 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colt Classic (Post 72625)
Maybe if they switch their base defense, they'll get rid of him. :cool:

"Does not fit the system....."

Indiana V2 07-27-2018 07:41 AM

Would never happen.

Oldcolt 08-07-2018 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indiana V2 (Post 72663)
Would never happen.

My thoughts exactly except now there are multiple rumors that the Raiders may actually be considering trading him. Gruden may love Key (their third rounder) enough to gamble or maybe its the Raiders being the Raiders. If true would you give two number ones for him? One and a player? Or is it to early to spend that money the Colts still have on the books?

Dam8610 08-07-2018 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldcolt (Post 73828)
My thoughts exactly except now there are multiple rumors that the Raiders may actually be considering trading him. Gruden may love Key (their third rounder) enough to gamble or maybe its the Raiders being the Raiders. If true would you give two number ones for him? One and a player? Or is it to early to spend that money the Colts still have on the books?

I'd do a 2020 1st and maybe some other picks but that's it. All Richard Seymour got was a 1st two drafts from when he was traded, and Mack is that caliber of player.

VeveJones007 08-07-2018 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 73841)
I'd do a 2020 1st and maybe some other picks but that's it. All Richard Seymour got was a 1st two drafts from when he was traded, and Mack is that caliber of player.

Seymour was 29 and had averaged 5-6 sacks/year. Mack turns 27 this year and has averaged over 10 sacks/year.

Dam8610 08-07-2018 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 73850)
Seymour was 29 and had averaged 5-6 sacks/year. Mack turns 27 this year and has averaged over 10 sacks/year.

Sacks per year don't tell the whole story. In terms of value they're similar, maybe a premium for Mack's age, so a 2019 3 and a 2020 1?

VeveJones007 08-08-2018 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 73854)
Sacks per year don't tell the whole story. In terms of value they're similar, maybe a premium for Mack's age, so a 2019 3 and a 2020 1?

Two years of an elite player's prime is worth more than an extra 3rd.

Dam8610 08-08-2018 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 73908)
Two years of an elite player's prime is worth more than an extra 3rd.

Elite players have been traded in their prime for 2nd and 3rd round picks.

YDFL Commish 08-08-2018 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 73937)
Elite players have been traded in their prime for 2nd and 3rd round picks.

Why do you make posts that contradict each other?

smitty46953 08-09-2018 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish (Post 73973)
Why do you make posts that contradict each other?

He likes to hear/read himself talk, often seen arguing with "STOP" signs... :cool:

Luck4Reich 08-09-2018 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish (Post 73973)
Why do you make posts that contradict each other?

Because he is a walking, talking contradiction.:cool:

Dam8610 08-09-2018 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish (Post 73973)
Why do you make posts that contradict each other?

What post does that contradict?

Chaka 08-09-2018 10:47 AM

I think that the reality is that trading star players rarely yields the number/quality of high draft picks that fans believe their team should receive. This is probably because fans often focus primarily upon the on-field performance of the players involved and don't look at the business side of the deal.

From the Colts perspective, obtaining someone like Mack would unquestionably be a big boost to the defense. On the other hand, since he's holding out, as a practical matter it will also require the Colts to pay Mack full (or close to full) market value (i.e. $15M-20M or so). So really, Mack's value is should be something like: Mack = ($15-$20 million) + (what draft picks?).

Also, Mack's trade value is lower because he can be a free agent after the season, so conceivably could leave if he's intent on doing so like Kirk Cousins (albeit it's possible the team could use the franchise tag and pay him even more).

There's also a PR component to all of this, as I think the Raiders would need to get enough of a return so that they could save face with their fans.

The bottom line is that when and if Mack is traded, I think it will be for less than most fans expect.

Oldcolt 08-24-2018 03:54 PM

Stampede Blue now says Colts have inquired about Mack People are saying the Raiders want a number one and another high pick or young player. If true, do it.

Maniac 08-24-2018 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldcolt (Post 75938)
Stampede Blue now says Colts have inquired about Mack People are saying the Raiders want a number one and another high pick or young player. If true, do it.

1st rounder and Basham :D

omahacolt 08-24-2018 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 73841)
I'd do a 2020 1st and maybe some other picks but that's it. All Richard Seymour got was a 1st two drafts from when he was traded, and Mack is that caliber of player.

that was 27 years ago

JAFF 08-24-2018 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by omahacolt (Post 75950)
that was 27 years ago

Seymor was done when he was traded. Still a cheater, but he wasn't the star with the Cheatriots

JAFF 08-24-2018 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JesusChrist (Post 75940)
1st rounder and Basham :D

A second and a years supply of tide for washing uniforms

FatDT 08-24-2018 11:16 PM

I'd do a first as long as we agree to terms on a contract extension. And no three year bullshit. At least 4, preferably 5.

Colt Classic 08-25-2018 07:08 AM

Vet maximum

Dam8610 08-26-2018 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colt Classic (Post 76018)
Vet maximum

This isn't the NBA, there are no maximums.

Coltsalr 08-26-2018 10:44 PM

@DanLeach1971
Just heard from a Metro Detroit limo driver that he just picked up Raiders LB Khalil Mack and he is going to meet with #Lions GM Bob Quinn Monday. Stay tuned.......

Brylok 08-26-2018 11:22 PM

Has this become a meme or something? If he leaves, he's not coming to Indy anyway, so who cares?

Racehorse 08-27-2018 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 76196)
This isn't the NBA, there are no maximums.

Surely you are not THAT dumb!

Chaka 08-27-2018 03:57 PM

Why Mack may come at a cheaper price than you'd expect:

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/...ck-this-season

Dam8610 08-27-2018 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Racehorse (Post 76285)
Surely you are not THAT dumb!

The NBA has max contracts, the NFL does not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaka (Post 76353)
Why Mack may come at a cheaper price than you'd expect:

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/...ck-this-season

That article summarizes why teams aren't going to pay for him in all likelihood. He's a free agent after the season, so if the Raiders really don't want him, they'll let him go (at which point Ballard should have a fueled up private jet with a nonstop course to Indy parked in front of Mack), but teams aren't willing to pay the price Oakland will want because the 2019 class is loaded at DL. The Colts may have 3 top 50 picks in next year's draft, and it's conceivable that they could use them all on DL and get good value.

Racehorse 08-28-2018 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 76396)
The NBA has max contracts, the NFL does not.



I guess you ARE that dumb after all.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.