![]() |
Holder had a chat on the Athletic yesterday and said Joe Mixon wasn’t on the team’s board in 2017. I don’t think the reports on Simmons or Ferguson are anywhere near as bad, but it’s something to keep in mind.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I disagree on your Tillery assessment. I think he can play inside in this D and was very successful pass rushing last year. I also don’t think a WR will be in those top two picks. Too many to choose from and not a lot at the top. I’ve heard NFL GMs see about 14 legitimate first round picks this year. I think if one of them drops we will grab one regardless of position, unless it’s QB. That includes oline and any of the TE’s. |
Quote:
Compare that to Dre'mont Jones here, where he's shooting the B gap almost every play. In particular, watch the play at 0:40. Tillery doesn't have the quickness to pull that off, which is a key part of what Eberflus wants on the interior. |
Quote:
I think Ballard will prefer to get 3 of those "good" players at 26, 34, and 59, but I do wonder if there's one of those elite guys that he would try to move up and take. You'd still end up with 1 "elite" player and 1 "good" player, but I think Ballard's preference is to minimize the risk and have as many quality picks as he can get. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think Tillery can do it. You have to examine what he was asked to do when considering. For example Ed Oliver was asked to 0-tech almost half of his snap, maybe more. But when he was asked to 3-tech he was pretty effective. Up there with the other tackles. Tillery just wasn’t always asked to do it. But yeah the Stanford game as Dam said is s good game to look at. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.