ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum
Page 2 of 5 1 2 34 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   2018 NFL Scouting Combine Thread (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=36418)

natagu23 03-03-2018 05:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by falloutboy14 (Post 57465)
Those numbers are pretty close to Julius Peppers:. 6'6", 283, 34" arms, 10" hands. He only ran the 40 and did 4.68. so we'll see what he does tomorrow​.


Also, Barkley had a hell of a day and I'm becoming ok with him over Chubb. The fact that we can walk away with either or a boat load of picks is a good thing.
Either....?

Listen. Lets draft Chubb and keep it moving.

Hoopsdoc 03-03-2018 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT (Post 57233)
RB and OL measurements are in. Orlando Brown is an enormous man. 6'8, 345, 35" arms. Wouldn't mind him in the second.
Yeah, but ran a statuesque 5.77 40 and only managed 14 reps on the bench.

Pass. Saquon Barkley did 29 reps.

Slow and weak doesn’t translate well in the nfl.

Dam8610 03-03-2018 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by falloutboy14 (Post 57465)
Those numbers are pretty close to Julius Peppers:. 6'6", 283, 34" arms, 10" hands. He only ran the 40 and did 4.68. so we'll see what he does tomorrow​.


Also, Barkley had a hell of a day and I'm becoming ok with him over Chubb. The fact that we can walk away with either or a boat load of picks is a good thing.
Davenport's measurables are closer to Peppers, and if he had any level of developed pass rush ability rather than just being a big strong guy who can muscle his way past some of the top talent in the world, I would've given him that comp. Size wise, Chubb compares favorably with Bruce Smith.

Also, no to Barkley and ideal is trade down and still get Chubb.

YDFL Commish 03-03-2018 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 57489)
Also, no to Barkley and ideal is trade down and still get Chubb.
Trade down and still get Chubb. That has to be everybody's wet dream, right?

FatDT 03-03-2018 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc (Post 57488)
Yeah, but ran a statuesque 5.77 40 and only managed 14 reps on the bench.

Pass. Saquon Barkley did 29 reps.

Slow and weak doesn’t translate well in the nfl.
Yeah. Hard pass on that dude. Terrible preparation for the biggest job interview of his life.

DrSpaceman 03-03-2018 08:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish (Post 57505)
Trade down and still get Chubb. That has to be everybody's wet dream, right?
That would be great if you can do it

FatDT 03-03-2018 08:53 PM
"Trade down and all the blue chip players are gone" is what I'm concerned would happen.

Butter 03-03-2018 09:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT (Post 57537)
"Trade down and all the blue chip players are gone" is what I'm concerned would happen.
I agree. If the guy you want is Chubb or Barkley and they are thee at 3 you take them.

FatDT 03-04-2018 07:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter (Post 57543)
I agree. If the guy you want is Chubb or Barkley and they are thee at 3 you take them.
The best prospects in this draft seem to probably be Barkley, Chubb, Nelson, and probably Fitzpatrick. We are in position to draft one of them, guaranteed. We don't really need Fitzpatrick. IMO the other three are the only real options. I'd only want to trade down a few picks, and then only if at least two of them are still there.

YDFL Commish 03-04-2018 12:21 PM
Chubb just ran a 4.66 that is faster than 95% of the QB's in the NFL, and probably fast enough to cover most NFL TE's.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 AM.
Page 2 of 5 1 2 34 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.