![]() |
Quote:
Second, where does any of this say that a trade would deliver Wentz‘s contract to the Colts “stripped of all guarantees” as you stated in Post 93 above? That’s what throws me the most. Wentz’s contract includes a number of guarantees that you’re not mentioning – including his now fully vested and guaranteed 2021 salary ($15.4M) and roster bonus ($10M), and the unvested guarantees relating to his 2022 salary ($22M) and roster bonus ($5M). Are you suggesting that Wentz would somehow forfeit these if the Eagles decide to trade him? I think he’d file a lawsuit against his agent if this were the case. No, those guarantees would travel with Wentz to the Colts, and the Colts would assume responsibility for them (and all remaining contract terms) moving forward. Third, I am lost in your calculations – how do you get to a 4-year / $66M remaining contract “with 2 roster bonuses of $5 million being the only guarantees on the deal”? I know you have a calculation in mind, but I just can’t figure out what it is. As I read it, between 2021-2024, Wentz is scheduled to receive about $78M in salary and another $20M in roster bonuses (all of the other money has already been paid), so that adds up to $98M, not $66M. And given your earlier statement that all guarantees get stripped from the contract after a trade, how could there still be “2 roster bonuses of $5 million being the only guarantees on the deal”? Fourth, if the Eagles were responsible for all guarantees in Wentz’s contract upon a trade, the cap hit would be almost $60M, not $34M as you state – the same as an outright release. This would include the $34M mentioned above (for his signing bonus and option bonus), his 2021 fully guaranteed salary ($15.4M) and his 2021 fully guaranteed roster bonus ($10M). Again, this is not the case, and essentially highlights the distinction between the cap consequences upon release ($60M) and trade ($34M). Neither are good, but a trade is actually feasible and actually might save them a few bucks against their existing 2021 and 2022 cap totals (Remember, if he stays for the 2021 season, Wentz will count $34.6M against their cap AND by doing so they’ll trigger a $15M guarantee for 2022 as well). Again, given the circumstances, I think the Eagles should have a very strong incentive to find a trade partner for Wentz, as they probably can't afford to cut him and while they'll feel pain no matter what in 2021, keeping him around will damage their 2022 cap as well. The acquiring team would be asked to take on a big cap number themselves too, along with the risk created by his recent poor performance. So a 6-7th rounder should be all that is necessary. EDIT – I have learned since my original post is the “option” number mentioned in the contract payment chart is simply a prorated breakdown of a $30M “option bonus” provided to Wentz at the outset of the contract. This is money already in his pocket, but per the CBA rules you cited, is spread across the entire length of the contract for cap purposes. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
1 Year / $40.4M 2 Year / $47.4M 3 year / $72.4M 4 year / $98.4M On the issue of trade value, reasonable minds can of course disagree. Certainly, he brings a lot of upside, and that upside by itself is no doubt worth a 3rd round pick in isolation, but we also have to consider the cost to the Colts (at least $40.4M, probably more), the risks/potential downside given his most recent performance, and perhaps most importantly the existing pressure on Philly to unload him. They are something like $60M-$70M over next year’s cap already, so they desperately need to make some major changes and can’t afford to keep paying a backup QB this kind of money. Those factors should significantly reduce his value in a negotiation context to the point that I think only a nominal pick and/or player would be required in return. In a way, I’d actually be strangely encouraged if the Colts were forced into giving the Eagles a 3rd round pick for him, since that would suggest to me that we REALLY like him and are confident that whatever went wrong this season can be fixed, and/or that there was lots of competition for him and thus other teams like him as well. I have faith in the process here, since I don’t think Ballard will be bamboozled into paying significantly more than he’s worth. |
Quote:
Even if you were right about the second year guarantee, $40 million would represent a $5 million decrease in investment in the QB position for the Colts. |
Quote:
From the Eagle's perspective, however, it is possible (though very unlikely in my view) that if they can't find a trade partner, they could go nuclear and cut him, absorb the $60M cap hit next year to be done with it. In that case, assuming they did this prior to March 20, they wouldn't have to pay the $15M because it would not have vested yet. Spotrac's breakdown is from the perspective of the Eagles, not any potential trade partners. |
And what have we learned? Too much money screws up a fun game. See baseball as an example
|
At any rate, that's a lot of money to give a QB with a career 89 passer rating and a winning percentage of .514.
Reich would have to be very certain that he can turn him around. |
Quote:
Considering that his issues seem to be poor playcalling for his skillset, trying to do too much, and mechanics (in a year where a pandemic eliminated the preseason and OTAs), and that he was MVP caliber with Reich as his OC, I think Wentz's best chance of turning it around is with the Colts, where he'll have a team that he doesn't have to carry to win and Reich has demonstrated the ability to tailor an offense to his skillset and has fixed his mechanical issues previously. |
Quote:
It's worth noting that this contract structure would actually be somewhat consistent with some of Ballard’s other contracts, where the guarantees are all in the first couple years, leaving lots of flexibility at the backend. Look at the contracts for DeForest Buckner and Ryan Kelly – both have all of the guarantees in the first two years. |
Quote:
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/a...r%20his%202021 I note the numbers used by the agent in the above article include a few other discrepancies from the Spotrac calculations, so there may be nuances that one or the other have missed. The agent's take appears to be pretty consistent with what I've laid out in prior posts regarding cap hits, etc. to an acquiring team. And he seems to think that the cap numbers will make it difficult to find a taker for Wentz - so again, I think a third rounder would be a significant overpay. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.